https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lqYq0XwE76Zy02UFFZdFFpbDA/view?usp=sharinghttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5lqYq0XwE76Zy02UFFZdFFpbDA/view?usp=sharing
 |
| "Dying Lords" Cover on Magnetic Silver Translucent Photofilm. |
Analysis by David Batstone.
In approaching the score for "Dying Lords"—a composition for alto flute and flugelhorn—the Impedium notational system invites us into a world of compounded presumption and bold experimentation. This score does not simply lay down a roadmap for sound; it engages in a philosophical dialogue with tradition and innovation in musical notation, pushing boundaries in ways that challenge our understanding of structure, interpretation, and agency within music.
The Impedium system is described as containing a “compounded tacrographic system,” and indeed, one feels the palpable tension between order and freedom in the notation. Tacrography, here, suggests a kind of disciplined notational shorthand, but with compounded layers, each element resists simplification. This is a notation system that reflects an institutional jurisdiction—a framework that both delineates authority over the musical material and subtly rebels against it.
Reckless Presumption and the Notation of Variability
The score’s notation exercises a reckless presumption that is almost defiant. What does it mean for a composer to presume recklessly? In the case of “Dying Lords,” it reflects a bold confidence in the capacity of variability itself. The notation suggests that the performers are not mere interpreters of static symbols, but rather co-creators whose interpretative instincts are brought to the forefront. The compounded layers of tacrographic notation do not prescribe a single, definitive path; rather, they offer a matrix of choices, a lattice through which the performer’s agency is invited to interact with the composer’s framework.
This notion of variability is not about randomness but about contingency. Each notational layer introduces potential shifts and alterations in rhythm, pitch, or timbre, acknowledging the fluid nature of sound and interpretation. Here, variability becomes a central element—not an accessory or afterthought, but a core principle embedded within the score’s very structure. In doing so, "Dying Lords" rejects the notion of a fixed musical truth in favor of a truth that is continually reinvented.
Institutional Jurisdiction and Stewardship Protocols
The term “institutional jurisdiction” applied to a musical score may seem paradoxical. What institution is being referenced here? In this context, it seems to point towards the jurisdiction of tradition and form in musical composition—a framework that gives structure but also places constraints on creation. The “stewardship protocols” embedded in the score imply a kind of guardianship over these notational elements, suggesting that certain boundaries are in place to maintain coherence. Yet, these boundaries do not exist to limit creativity but to preserve the integrity of the composition as an evolving entity.
The notion of stewardship also hints at a responsibility given to the performer. By engaging with the Impedium system, the performer is entrusted with maintaining a balance between the intended form and the inherent variability of the score. It is a responsibility that does not bind but liberates, allowing the performer to act as both custodian and innovator.
Preventing the Notation from Being Fabricated Anew
An intriguing aspect of the Impedium system is its refusal to allow the notation to be “fabricated anew.” In essence, the score resists complete reinvention. There is an underlying respect for continuity and stability within the work; each performance may differ, but it must remain within certain notational parameters that protect the identity of the piece. The notation is thus a living document, dynamic in its interpretive potential yet anchored in its fidelity to the composer’s vision.
In philosophical terms, this resistance to fabrication anew might be seen as an insistence on authenticity and integrity. The composer has not only left room for variability but has done so within a system that upholds the piece’s core identity. The composition does not permit a free-for-all re-imagining; rather, it allows for an interpretative flexibility that stays true to the foundational spirit of the work.
Eclecticism as a Method and a Philosophy
The eclectic nature of the score for “Dying Lords” is not a mere stylistic choice but a philosophical stance. By combining elements of various notational traditions within the Impedium system, the composer acknowledges the complexity of human experience and the multifaceted nature of expression. This eclectic approach challenges the performer to move between different modes of understanding, requiring them to engage with the score in an intellectually and emotionally dynamic way.
The compounded layers of tacrographic notation reflect a willingness to embrace complexity, even when it borders on the chaotic. It is as though the score is saying, “Life is not neat, so why should music be?” There is a resilience in this approach, a faith that beauty and coherence can emerge from disorder, that meaning can be forged through the process of interpretation.
In “Dying Lords,” we find a score that is at once institutional and subversive, structured and free, disciplined and wild. The Impedium system’s compounded tacrography is an invitation to reimagine the relationship between composer and performer, between notation and sound, between order and chaos. It is a work that asks us to confront our assumptions about musical authority and to embrace a more participatory, communal vision of music-making.
The notational eclecticism of “Dying Lords” ultimately invites performers into a dialogue with the unknown, challenging them to engage with contingency, to find coherence in multiplicity, and to honor a form that respects both tradition and transformation. In this way, “Dying Lords” stands as a testament to the power of music to be both grounded and transcendent, rooted in the present yet reaching toward possibilities that are continually unfolding.
No comments:
Post a Comment