Wednesday, February 26, 2025

"Locked Transit" for Flute and Bassoon.



"Locked Transit" for Flute and Bassoon.  

Published by LNM Editions

(Laboratorie New Music)



Sunday, February 23, 2025

"Barb's Invisible Chimera" For Solo Flute

 



"Barb's Invisible Chimera" For Solo Flute

Bil Smith Composer

2024-2025

10 Images. 32” X 28”; 81.28 X 71.12 cm

Ink, Graphite, Acrylic, Metallic Powder, Gunpowder on Ilford Galerie Prestige Gold Fibre Silk

Edition of 5 with 2 APs




My new work for solo flute, "Barb's Invisible Chimera"  is a boundary-pushing musical composition that defies conventional expectations of both notation and performance, blending elements of visual art and sound in a way that challenges the performer’s interpretative instincts.
Conceptual Framework
The title Barb’s Invisible Chimera hints at a dialogue with the work of conceptual artist Barbara Kruger. Kruger’s signature style—bold textual interventions that critique consumerism and societal power structures—finds an echo in this work, which manipulates musical notation, imagery, and textual constructs to convey a layered critique of perception and interpretation in contemporary music.
My engagement with semiotic structures extends beyond music into branding and pharmaceuticals, drawing inspiration from the language of medical and commercial industries. My lexicon mirrors the syntacticons found in pharmaceutical branding, where invented words, color associations, and typography contribute to an overarching psychological effect. This aesthetic is reminiscent of Damien Hirst’s fascination with the pharmaceutical industry, aligning the notation of Barb’s Invisible Chimera with the conceptual weight of contemporary visual art.


Notational Structure and The Jubal Project
A central feature of Barb's Invisible Chimera is its incorporation of my Jubal Project notation archetype. The Jubal Project is an experimental notation system that departs from traditional staff-based representation, instead using striking circular color combinations, gestural mark-making, and unconventional symbols to communicate sonic intent. This system redefines the relationship between performer and score, transforming interpretation into an active, almost improvisational process.
This composition is a realization of an "idea of a moment in time for the flutist," placing emphasis on the ephemeral nature of sound and performance. By integrating Jubal Project notation, the score becomes an interactive, kinetic object—one that demands engagement beyond mere visual deciphering.


Materiality and Medium
The choice of materials in Barb’s Invisible Chimera contributes significantly to its impact. Ilford Galerie Prestige Gold Fibre Silk paper, known for its rich, tactile surface, serves as a base for the intricate layering of ink, graphite, acrylic, and metallic powder. The addition of gunpowder—a volatile, elemental material—imbues the score with a sense of transience and combustibility, reinforcing the idea of performance as an act of momentary existence. The materiality of the score is thus inseparable from its musical realization, making the process of interpreting and performing the piece inherently linked to its physical presence.
Performance Considerations
Performing Barb’s Invisible Chimera requires the flutist to engage with the score in a non-traditional manner. The absence of standard musical notation means that the performer must develop a unique interpretative strategy based on:
  1. Color and Shape Recognition – The Jubal Project notation system employs color coding and geometric forms to suggest specific timbres, dynamics, and articulation techniques.
  2. Gestural Reading – The physical markings on the score often imply movement and energy rather than discrete pitches, necessitating a gestural approach to sound production.
  3. Temporal Fluidity – The composition resists strict metric structuring, favoring an organic, free-flowing temporality that adapts to the performer’s intuition and physical response to the score.
  4. Multisensory Engagement – The interplay between visual art and sound demands an expanded sensory approach, where the flutist’s interpretation is influenced by visual stimuli as much as by traditional musical thought.
Aesthetic and Philosophical Implications
This work is intended to raise critical questions about the nature of composition, authorship, and the role of the performer. By relinquishing rigid control over musical outcomes, Barb’s Invisible Chimera situates the performer as a co-creator, blurring the line between composer and interpreter. This aligns with postmodern artistic discourses that challenge hierarchical structures in artistic production.
Furthermore, the pharmaceutical branding aesthetic embedded in the notation hints at deeper cultural commentaries—specifically, the ways in which language, imagery, and commodification shape human cognition and behavior. My approach suggests a parallel between the performative aspects of pharmaceutical branding and the performative nature of musical interpretation, highlighting the constructed realities inherent in both domains.
Conclusion
Barb’s Invisible Chimera for solo flute stands at the intersection of music, visual art, and conceptual philosophy. My integration of the Jubal Project notation archetype, combined with his unique material choices and cultural references, results in a work that is both provocative and enigmatic. For the flutist, the piece is less about executing predefined notes and more about inhabiting a shifting, momentary space of sonic and visual engagement.

By challenging traditional notions of notation, performance, and musical meaning, Barb’s Invisible Chimera continues my intent of pushing the boundaries of contemporary composition. It is a work that demands deep interpretative commitment, offering an ever-evolving experience that transcends conventional musical paradigms.





Wednesday, February 19, 2025

"Triumphant Adoration". A Fanfare for Zirnbauer Piccolo Trumpet. Link To PDF.

Zirnbauer Piccolo Trumpet

PDF Link to Score

In "Triumphant Adoration" you will note that the notational patterns appear with some uniformity, however each should be treated by the performer as a module capable of containing a variety of material sound possibilities.  The symbology serves numerous functional demands with a visually consistent solution.  

This notational system concurrently serves as a delivery device for informational, climactic, structural and aural interpretation.  The performer finds that unconventional categories and methods emerge; new hierarchies established and traditional trumpet performance boundaries are perforated.

The Power of Visual Representation: An Investigation into Non-Traditional Music Scores

 


Piece for Tuba


As the sphere of music composition continues to evolve, we find ourselves at a crossroads of sorts, with emerging technologies and approaches vying for our attention and allegiance. One such approach that has recently captured the imagination of composers and theorists alike is that of hyper-complex visualized scores. These scores, which combine intricate musical notation with highly abstract visual elements, offer a new way of understanding and engaging with musical composition, one that draws heavily on the work of thinkers such as Wilhelm Reich and Roland Barthes.
At its core, these radical scores represent a departure from traditional methods of musical notation. Rather than relying solely on written symbols and conventions, these scores incorporate a wide range of graphic elements, from abstract shapes and patterns to representational imagery and text. The result is a kind of synesthetic experience, where the visual and auditory elements of the music are intertwined in a complex and dynamic relationship.


But what are the implications of this new approach to music composition? For one thing, it raises questions about the role of notation in the creative process. Traditionally, musical notation has been seen as a kind of neutral medium, a way of encoding musical ideas in a way that can be easily shared and communicated. But with hyper-complex visualized scores, the notation becomes an integral part of the creative act, shaping the music itself in profound ways.

This shift in emphasis also has implications for the way we think about musical interpretation. In a traditional score, the written notation provides a kind of roadmap for performers, guiding them through the various elements of the music and helping them to bring it to life. But with hyper-complex visualized scores, the relationship between notation and performance becomes much more complex. Rather than simply following the written instructions, performers must engage with the visual elements of the score, interpreting them in a way that is both creative and responsive to the musical ideas being presented.

This brings us to the work of Wilhelm Reich, who saw the human body as a kind of musical instrument, capable of expressing and responding to the subtle nuances of sound and vibration. For Reich, music was a way of accessing the deep emotional and psychological energies that underlie our experience of the world. In a sense, hyper-complex visualized scores represent an extension of Reich's vision, offering a new way of accessing and expressing these energies through the medium of musical notation.

At the same time, hyper-complex visualized scores also draw heavily on the work of Roland Barthes, who famously wrote about the "death of the author" and the ways in which the meaning of a text is constructed by the reader, rather than by the author. This idea of the text as a kind of open, generative space is key to understanding the possibilities of hyper-complex visualized scoring. By creating scores that are at once highly structured and highly abstract, composers are opening up a space for interpretation and engagement that is far more expansive than traditional methods of notation.

But what are the challenges of working with hyper-complex visualized scores? For one thing, they require a high degree of technical skill and visual literacy on the part of both composer and performer. Unlike traditional scores, which can be read and understood by musicians with a relatively limited set of skills, hyper-complex visualized scores require a deep engagement with the visual elements of the music, as well as a willingness to experiment and take risks in the performance of the music.

At its core, hyper-complex visualized scoring can be understood as a fundamentally liberatory practice, one that seeks to subvert the hierarchical power structures that have long governed the creation and reception of musical works. In Reich's theory of orgonomy, for example, the human body is understood to be the primary locus of creative energy, with the production of musical works seen as a manifestation of this innate biological process. By extension, the role of the composer is not to impose their will upon the material, but rather to act as a facilitator, channeling the energy of the body into a coherent sonic form.

Similarly, Barthes' semiotic theory posits that meaning is not fixed or stable, but rather arises out of the complex interplay between signifiers and signifieds. In this sense, musical scores can be seen as a kind of language, with each note or symbol carrying its own unique set of associations and connotations. By embracing the inherent ambiguity and multiplicity of the musical language, hyper-complex visualized scores have the potential to create new forms of meaning that challenge conventional modes of interpretation and understanding.

Of course, the use of hyper-complex visualized scores also raises a number of significant challenges and questions. One of the primary concerns is the potential for these scores to become overly insular and elitist, catering only to a select group of highly trained musicians and scholars. This danger is particularly acute given the highly specialized vocabulary and notation systems that often accompany hyper-complex scoring, which can make it difficult for newcomers to access and engage with the works.

Another potential issue is the risk of over-reliance on technology, with composers and performers becoming too reliant on digital tools and software to generate and interpret the scores. This not only raises questions about the authenticity and originality of the works themselves, but also runs the risk of further entrenching existing power structures within the music industry, particularly with regard to the distribution and consumption of musical works.

Ultimately, however, the potential benefits of these scores far outweigh these challenges, particularly in terms of the ways in which it can disrupt traditional notions of musical authorship and interpretation. By foregrounding the role of the body, and by embracing the inherent ambiguity and multiplicity of the musical language, hyper-complex visualized scores offer a radical alternative to the hierarchical power structures that have long dominated the music industry. In so doing, they provide a powerful tool for artists and audiences alike to explore the myriad possibilities of musical creation, and to imagine new futures for the art form as a whole.

Sunday, February 9, 2025

"My Brutalist Tablatures"


My "Brutalist Tablatures"—structured upon the principles of Brutalist architecture, reject the ornamentation and historical continuity of the five-line staff. Instead, it embraces a stark, materially direct framework that prioritizes density, stratification, and spatial concreteness as primary vehicles of sonic articulation. Through an analysis of notational ergonomics, cognitive resistance, and semiotic deconstruction, this whitepaper presents Brutalist Tablature as an autonomous aesthetic object, not merely a container for sound.



Deconstructing the Five-Line Staff: Towards a Concrete Semiotics

The five-line staff, despite its entrenched cultural status, operates primarily as a passive intermediary—a translucent screen upon which sonic intentions are projected. By contrast, Brutalist Tablature foregrounds the structural grid as an active participant in compositional determination, embedding sonic parameters within an explicit architectonic topography. The redundant lines of traditional staff notation yield to an array of thickened slabs, subdivided by deliberate fissures that articulate durational instability and registral ambiguity.

Brutalist Tablature does not seek to be intuitive. It is obstinate, a site of tension between performer, score, and interpretative praxis. It demands that notation itself be as resistant to instant comprehension as the music it encodes.


Materiality as Notational Imperative: Density, Compression, Striation

Rather than relying on staves as mere orientation devices, Brutalist Tablature enforces a stratified, monolithic approach to pitch organization.

  • Density: Musical elements are inscribed in reinforced blocks, their relative opacity indicating degrees of parametric congestion. Verticality is no longer an index of absolute pitch but an indicator of polyphonic mass.

  • Compression: Instead of barlines, partitions of sonic mass are delineated by intrusion zones—areas where musical materials coalesce into singular gestural entities before erupting into fracture lines.

  • Striation: Sonic artifacts—articulations, timbral specifications, extended techniques—exist as textural encrustations within a framework of structured erosion.

This spatialization of musical matter ensures that the score exists as an object of interpretation rather than transcription, requiring performers to engage with notation as material rather than symbolic suggestion.


The Architectonics of Gesture: Performative Agglomeration and Resistance

Brutalist Tablature does not grant the performer passage—it obstructs, resists, and asserts its own presence. Each gesture must be excavated from a matrix of encoded density, a process of confrontation rather than mere execution. It subverts the prescriptive function of traditional notation in favor of a topological relationship between player and material.

Gesture is no longer a matter of indicated movement but of structural intervention:

  • Thickened zones denote haptic intensity, requiring shifts in bodily pressure rather than merely volume or dynamic contrast.

  • Collapsed spaces function as sonic voids, sites of non-action that demand interpretative inertia as much as engagement.

  • Forced overlap disrupts sequential legibility, requiring the performer to engage with multiple layers of simultaneous decision-making.

The result is a score that exists not to instruct but to provoke, an active field of resistance against conventional interpretative fluidity.

Brutalist Tablature is neither an alternative notation nor a mere reorganization of conventional graphic principles. It is a concrete sonic architecture—a mass of musical raw material, an insistent structure of sonic determination.

In this model, the score ceases to be a translucent vehicle for sound. Instead, it manifests as an autonomous brutalist object, imposing its own weight upon the performer, demanding excavation rather than passive reading.

Notation becomes concrete, raw, indelible.

Music, in turn, emerges not from the passive act of playing but from an architectural confrontation between body, score, and sound.


Friday, February 7, 2025

The Brutalist Tablature: The Raw Sonic Aesthetic in Contemporary Composition

 



Brutalist Tablature: The Raw Sonic Aesthetic in Contemporary Composition


Introduction: The Intersection of Sound and Concrete Form

In the landscape of contemporary composition, Bil Smith has carved out a radical notational paradigm known as Brutalist Tablature. This system, borrowing its conceptual rigor from Brutalist architecture, challenges traditional methods of music notation by emphasizing raw, unfiltered structure, materiality, and function. Much like the exposed concrete and rigid geometries of Brutalism, Smith’s tablature refuses embellishment, prioritizing bold, structural notation over conventional expressive phrasing.

Brutalist Tablature is a visual and conceptual departure from classical staff notation and modern graphical scores. Rather than presenting music as an organic flow of interpretative gestures, it manifests as an architectural framework, dictating sonic behavior in a way that is severe, monolithic, and unapologetically confrontational.

Brutalism in Architecture and Music: Parallel Principles

Brutalist architecture, emerging in the post-war period (1950s-1970s), was characterized by:

  1. Material Honesty – Exposed concrete (béton brut), raw textures, and structural integrity.
  2. Geometric Rigidity – Harsh lines, unornamented surfaces, and monumental presence.
  3. Functionality Over Beauty – Prioritizing use and efficiency over aesthetic appeal.
  4. Social Utopianism – Often linked to egalitarian and utilitarian philosophies.
  5. Confrontational Presence – Massive, heavy, and almost oppressive visual forms.

Bil Smith’s Brutalist Tablature follows these same tenets but transposes them into sonic architecture:

  • Material Honesty in Notation: Uses raw, heavily structured tablature with stark visual density—clusters of directives presented with extreme typographic weight and graphical rigidity.
  • Geometric Rigidity: Employs block-like formations of notational elements, creating a near-monolithic interpretation system.
  • Functionality Over Beauty: Prioritizes execution and structural intent over interpretative flexibility.
  • Social Utopianism: Moves away from elitist score-reading traditions and demands new interpretive strategies.
  • Confrontational Presence: Overwhelmingly complex notation, visually imposing and physically demanding for performers.

Deconstructing the Brutalist Tablature Aesthetic

Smith’s tablature is not merely an alternative notation—it is an ideological stance against the expressive romanticism of conventional Western notation. Below are its key aspects:

1. Architectural Massing in Notation

Just as Brutalist buildings use large, block-like structures, Smith’s scores often feature dense clusters of tablature symbols resembling urban fortifications rather than fluid melodic contours. The music, rather than flowing linearly, is stacked and layered, creating a perception of sound as a concrete edifice rather than an ephemeral event.

2. The Notation of Weight and Density

Smith’s tablature employs thick, bold staves and heavy graphic elements, sometimes printed in gray-toned layers, mimicking the tonal weight of raw concrete. Unlike the delicacy of classical notation, which invites precision, Brutalist Tablature is meant to overwhelm and intimidate, reinforcing a sense of sonic mass.

3. Anti-Ornamental Composition

Brutalist architecture often shuns decorative elements—its beauty lies in its functionality. Similarly, Smith’s notation eliminates unnecessary dynamic markings, articulation symbols, or expressive curves that might soften the score’s impact. Instead, directives are presented in rectilinear form, with minimal expressive compromise.

4. Modular Repetition and Brutalist Patterning

Much like modular Brutalist structures (e.g., Le Corbusier’s Unité d’Habitation), Smith’s notation employs repetitive graphic modules that can be reoriented, stacked, or looped. This reflects a non-hierarchical compositional approach, where repetition does not imply development but rather reinforces structure.

5. The Concreteness of Sonic Material

In Brutalist architecture, material is not disguised—concrete is concrete. Similarly, Smith’s notation presents sound as physical material rather than an abstract musical gesture. Performers interact with sound as a raw entity, much like Brutalist architects interacted with concrete without embellishment.

The Performative Challenge: Confronting the Mass

Brutalist Tablature demands a new approach to interpretation, one that often rejects conventional virtuosity in favor of muscular, architectural execution. Performers must navigate:

  • Non-linear structural reading, where tablature elements appear in unexpected sequences.
  • Visceral physicality, requiring extended techniques that mirror the heavy-handedness of Brutalist materiality.
  • Sonic monoliths, where timbral mass takes precedence over harmonic/melodic development.

For instruments like the euphonium, contrabass, or prepared piano, Smith’s notation creates heavy, suffocating sonorities, forming auditory equivalents to Brutalist megastructures.

Brutalist Tablature in Contemporary Music: Implications and Reception

Smith’s approach has been both celebrated and criticized. Advocates see it as:

  • A rejection of Western Romanticism, favoring raw materialism.
  • A revolutionary alternative to traditional notation, offering new structural clarity.
  • A method for large-scale sonic architecture, paralleling avant-garde traditions of Xenakis and Ligeti.

Critics argue:

  • It is needlessly dense, obscuring performative nuance.
  • It prioritizes visual impact over musical fluidity.
  • It alienates performers unfamiliar with graphic music notation.

Yet, much like Brutalist architecture, Brutalist Tablature is not about comfort—it is about presence, force, and uncompromising identity.

Bil Smith’s Brutalist Tablature represents a radical rethinking of musical notation, embodying the same stark, functional, and imposing ethos as its architectural counterpart. It stands as a rejection of excess, a tribute to material honesty, and an exploration of sonic weight.

In an era where musical aesthetics are often softened for accessibility, Brutalist Tablature dares to be difficult, challenging performers and audiences to confront the sheer weight of sonic structure—a Brutalist monument in musical form.



"Elara Eclipse" For Piccolo Saxophone (Soprillo), Inderbinen Big Bell B Flat Trumpet and Theorbo. Bil Smith Composer

"Elara Eclipse"

For Piccolo Saxophone (Soprillo), Inderbinen Big Bell B Flat Trumpet
and Theorbo

Bil Smith Composer

2023

Published by LNM Editions

A Commission from Munich Re

The composition "Elara Eclipse" for Piccolo Saxophone (Soprillo), Inderbinen Big Bell B Flat Trumpet, and Theorbo employs a paratactic notational system which is based on my theorem of juxtaposing musical elements without connecting them in a linear fashion which creates a sense of fragmentation and non-linearity that is characteristic of the postmodernist era in which we live.
The use of the Paratactic notational system is significant because it challenges the traditional approach to music composition, which has often been characterized by a linear, hierarchical structure. In contrast, the Paratactic notational breaks down these structures and allows for a more fluid and open-ended approach to composition.
One of the central themes of the composition is the idea of identity and its construction through power relations. This is reflected in the use of historically diverse instruments and their interaction with each other, which creates a sense of hierarchy and dominance.
At the same time, however, there is also a sense of resistance and subversion that runs through the composition. The different elements challenge and disrupt each other, creating a sense of instability and ambiguity that reflects the fluid nature of identity and power.
The use of the Inderbinen Big Bell B Flat Trumpet and Theorbo also adds a historical dimension to the composition. Both instruments are associated with different time periods and cultural contexts, and their inclusion in the composition creates a sense of continuity and connection between the past and present.



 

"Perisetta, Barefoot and Dusted with Refinery Ash": A Score for String Quartet

"Perisetta, Barefoot and Dusted with Refinery Ash": A Score for String Quartet

Introduction: Temporal Structures in Sound

The score for Perisetta, Barefoot and Dusted with Refinery Ash for string quartet is a study in systematic repetition, mathematical structuring, and stark formalism, drawing inspiration from the process-driven mark-making of Hanne Darboven and the clinical yet confrontational aesthetic of Thomas Ruff’s portrait photography. In both Darboven’s obsessive recording of time through numerical systems and Ruff’s forensic depiction of the human face, we find a commitment to accumulation, iteration, and a near-bureaucratic confrontation with form.

By translating these visual and conceptual methodologies into sound, the score functions as an auditory transcription of duration, repetition, and erasure, challenging conventional ideas of development in musical structure.


I. Score as Repetitive Notation: The Darboven Influence

At the heart of this composition lies a notation system built on cumulative repetition, mirroring Darboven’s relentless handwritten numerals and calendar-based sequencing. The score does not unfold in a traditionally teleological manner; instead, it builds in grid-like accumulations of repeated gestures, which function as a sonic equivalent to Darboven’s vast wall installations of copied texts and figures.

Mathematical Structures & Temporal Expansion

  • Like Darboven’s installations, the music’s structure maps time itself, with the performers tracing through a field of prescribed gestures rather than progressing towards resolution.

Handwriting as Sound: The Ritual of Mark-Making

  • Each instrument enacts a daily inscription of notes, accumulating in layers of slight variation, akin to the way Darboven’s handwriting accumulated into walls of near-identical pages.

  • Repeated bowing techniques—sul ponticello scrapes, harmonic glissandi, and shifting microtonal trills—function as the equivalent of pen strokes, obsessively documenting the passage of sonic time.

  • The material is fixed but mutable, allowing the players to slightly alter their articulations in a manner akin to handwriting inconsistencies within structured repetition.


II. The Ruff Influence: Static Portraits in Sound

Where Darboven’s influence is in the rigid structuring of time, Thomas Ruff’s photography provides a model for the score’s cold, enlarged sonic surfaces. Ruff’s portraits are emotionally neutral yet invasive, forcing an intensified scrutiny of texture, imperfection, and presence.

Musical Surface as Photographic Exposure

  • The quartet is treated as a single, composite entity, akin to a neutral photographic background upon which subtle variations emerge.

  • The score utilizes high-resolution timbral focus, exaggerating overtones, bow pressure, and micro-adjustments in vibrato, much like Ruff’s hyper-detailed depictions of skin texture and tonal gradation.

  • By magnifying these subtle shifts, the composition achieves an uncanny stillness, where the sound is both neutral and overwhelming—a confrontation between objectivity and presence.

Lack of Expressive Depth: The Anti-Narrative Approach

  • Traditional phrasing, tension-and-release structures, and harmonic motion are largely absent.

  • The performers’ role is not to convey emotion but to enact presence—to inhabit the material without interpretation.

  • This lack of psychological depth, in contrast to the density of surface-level detail, is a direct challenge to the listener’s expectations of portraiture in sound.


III. Large-Scale Accumulation & The Aesthetic of Overwhelm

Both Darboven and Ruff use scale as a tool of excess—one through endless pages of numerical inscriptions, the other through gigantic photographic enlargements. Perisetta mirrors this approach in the way it expands static elements into a monumental experience.

Overlapping Layers & The Perception of Stasis

  • The score eliminates foreground/background distinctions, allowing for a flat auditory plane, similar to Ruff’s uniform lighting that erases narrative depth.

  • The result is both immersive and alienating—a document of time’s passage without traditional markers of progression.

Perisetta, Barefoot and Dusted with Refinery Ash is an attempt to reconcile the materiality of time, surface, and repetition in a string quartet context. By drawing on Darboven’s obsessive numerical structures and Ruff’s detached yet invasive photographic realism, the score resists narrative and emotional depth, offering instead a neutral yet imposing document of sonic presence. It is a work where the act of playing becomes an act of recording, where music does not progress but inscribes itself onto a durational landscape, moment by moment, until nothing remains but the imprint of repetition.