Sunday, February 24, 2019
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Friday, February 22, 2019
Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
"le piano octosyllabique"
Monday, January 21, 2019
REVISIT: Dicky Barrett. "You Are In or You Are Out".
![]() |
| "Syree" Bil Smith Composer |
![]() |
| Richard Barrett |
He so gallantly posted this score prior to performance and I took the opportunity to interpret it visually in a different manner (and yes, prior to the premiere). It's a re-appropriation of his work. It can be interpreted as a mockery or a compliment. (You decide). If you are unfamiliar with this concept, check out Walter Benjamin or perhaps better, in the world of literature, Kenneth Goldsmith. Bach and Kreidler come to mind as well.
I entitled this work "Syree", and yes, there is a message in the name.
Richard, part of the prescribed composers of "The New Complexity" did not take well to this, but then, I did not expect him to either. I do not say that as a ridicule of the composers categorized with this moniker. While it may not be in vogue in certain circles, I personally, find Brian Ferneyhough one of the most brilliant minds the music world has ever experienced.
![]() |
| Brian Ferneyhough |
I do believe that reappropriation/appropriation is a new authority of thematic claims that can literally and metaphorically define a disruptive, radical shift in compositional discourse.
As in Poker - You're In or You're Out. - Bil
![]() |
| James Erber, Composer. Another fantastic mind and a complete inspiration. |
Let's relieve the stave of its duty and move on.
![]() |
| Rethinking the five (5) lines. A new stave. A new musical lexicon. |
Let's relieve the stave of its duty and move on.
By creating a new musical language (syntacticon/lexicon) I show how a more satisfying account might be developed, once a distinction is made between two kinds of awareness. (You will not learn this here. You will need to read my other writing).
![]() |
| Portrait: Dick Barrett. Photography by Annie Liebovitz. |
Let's consider the following...'to be is to be the value of a variable’: certain serious composer's theoretical claims about what there is, or what exists, are most perspicuously articulated using the quantifier of first-order logic.
On this view, one incurs ontological commitment to whatever one’s first-order theory quantifies over.
I have a few dear composers (mostly scholarly improvisers - and I say that tongue in cheek) who I hold in the lowest denominator of creativity.
![]() |
| Ebola Virus...a.k.a. The Five Lines |
Some composers have different attitudes towards the relationship between ontological inquiry and first-order quantification, including: those complexists who claim that being is distinct from existence; those who hold that other expressions (e.g. predicates) can incur ontological commitment.
Hmm...let's place Jessie J. in a room with Dick Barrett.
Composers who reject the idea that all serious talk about being and existence can be captured by the first-order quantifier, and those who deny that first-order notational systems are the best vehicles for articulating metaphysical theories are ___________ (you fill in the blank).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















