In my compositional framework, hypo-neology (the creation of sub-words, proto-words, or semi-legible linguistic fragments) is not merely a poetic flourish, but a central ontological axis of the score itself. Where neology concerns the invention of entirely new words, hypo-neology engages the threshold of language, operating beneath standard meaning, at the level of gesture, impulse, and sonic residue. These lexical artifacts function less as symbols to be decoded and more as auditory fossils, embedded in the strata of the visual field.
Lexical Residue as Sonic Prompt
Hypo-neologisms in my scores exist in a pre-semantic or post-lexical state, partially eroded, over-inscribed, looped, or mirrored. They are not intended to communicate directly in linguistic terms. Instead, they perform as notation-objects, catalyzing sonic imagination in the performer.
Rather than specifying pitch, rhythm, or articulation in traditional ways, these word-forms ask:
What does this fragment feel like when sounded?
What vocal inflection does a crumpled word demand?
What gesture is required to complete an unfinished sentence?
The Score as Polylingual Palimpsest
Influenced by Hanne Darboven’s numerico-linguistic grids, Ed Ruscha’s textual austerity, and Tacita Dean’s archival poetics, my use of hypo-neology situates the score as a layered site; a part linguistic excavation, part speculative grammar. The performer is placed in the position of a semantic archaeologist, encountering linguistic fragments whose original context has been lost or deliberately withheld.
This aligns with the visual texture of my pages, which often include:
-
Typographic microstructures
-
Crossed-out neologisms
-
Echoic syllabic forms
-
Spatialized language arranged not for reading, but for listening with the eyes
Tactile Semantics and Performer Activation
The hypo-neologism acts as an activator. It is a point of engagement for the performer’s interpretive imagination. Drawing influence from Cornelius Cardew’s graphic provocations and Alberto Burri’s ruptured surfaces, the fractured word in my notation becomes sonic material, sculpted not just by voice or instrument, but by touch, breath, and interpretive risk.
These elements are often designed to be:
-
Unreadable but pronounceable
-
Familiar yet untranslatable
-
Silent but resonant
This tension creates a field of ontological uncertainty where sound emerges not from instructions, but from lexical hauntings from what might have been a word, a name, a direction.
Hypo-Neology as Resistance to Semantic Closure
The hypo-neologic fragment resists the tyranny of closure. Unlike traditional notation, which fixes meaning into reproducible sound events, my use of text operates in the fugitive zone between language and noise, reading and voicing, image and utterance.
This is a deliberate political and aesthetic stance. Inspired by Enrico Castellani’s tension fields and Burri’s ruptures, I use hypo-neology to rupture the presumed transparency of the score. It is an anti-authoritarian act. A refusal of the fixed. A commitment to semantic entropy.
The Composer as Lexical Architect
In sum, hypo-neology in my compositional approach is not a side-effect of poetic excess. It becomes a structural tool, a performative condition, and a methodological commitment. The invented fragment is the score’s heartbeat: unstable, intimate, and unfinished.
It invites the performer not to obey, but to co-author, to listen to the page the way one listens to ruins, archives, or tongues never fully learned.
The hypo-neologic score does not say what it means.
It becomes what you hear when you try to make it say anything at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment