Saturation is often treated as something to avoid. We fear the smear of too much information. We worry that lines will blur, that gesture will lose its edge. This post takes the opposite view. Overwriting becomes a deliberate method. Density is not a byproduct. It is the score.
Overwriting can live on the page as a visible engine. Notation is only one layer. The score becomes a site where media collide and leave evidence. The player reads those collisions as instruction, resistance, and invitation. Sound grows out of what the eye must reconcile.
What overwriting means in a visual score
Overwriting is the deliberate stacking of heterogeneous marks and materials on a shared surface. Staff notation sits beside vector scaffolds, photomontage, chromatic fields, stickers, tape, and hand ink. Each layer proposes a rule. None enjoys total authority. The page holds concurrency. The performer edits in real time.
Overwriting distributes agency. The composer sets the ecology. The performers make local law. Credit that labor. Keep space in the parts for performer notes. Invite those notes back into the next edition of the score.
A visual score can conduct by pressure rather than instruction. Multiple media create a field of forces that bends time, touch, and timbre. When spines, gates, fields, and beacons work together, the music acquires continuity without the crutch of a single syntax. The page becomes both archive and generator. Overwriting is not clutter. It is the instrument.
No comments:
Post a Comment