Toponymic Notation: The City Name as Musical Instruction in Post-Conceptual Score Design
How the names of cities function as pitch, duration, cultural memory, and performative provocation within the expanded graphic score tradition
Look at the score page and find the word CHONGQING.
It is not labeled as a city. It is not footnoted, not explained, not situated within any cartographic context that would tell you where it sits on the earth's surface or what its relationship is to the stave running through the score's horizontal field. It is simply there, in a typeface larger than the musical notation surrounding it, its scale suggesting that it carries more weight than the accidentals floating above it and less weight than the white space consuming the right edge of the page. It occupies a specific position relative to the stave. It crosses certain lines and not others. It arrives after SAMARKAND and before CEBU CITY, and this sequence is not alphabetical, not geographical, not chronological in any system that a map or a history book would recognize.
So what is it?
The answer, or the beginning of one, is that CHONGQING in this context is a notational element. It is doing the work that notation does: it is telling a performer something about what to produce, when to produce it, and for how long. But it is doing this work through a different mechanism than the mechanism that a conventional note head uses, and understanding that difference is the point.
The Name as Pitch
Western staff notation encodes pitch through vertical position. A note sitting on the third line of a treble clef is a B. The system is elegant and precise and has served the tradition for centuries. It works because it makes a single claim: that pitch is a property of vertical position in a fixed spatial grid, and that this grid is the same for every performer reading the score.
Toponymic notation makes a different claim. The city name sits at a specific vertical position relative to the stave, and this position is not incidental. CHONGQING in one score crosses the third and fourth lines. UUMMANNAQ, in the far right of the same page, has migrated so far from the stave's gravitational field that its vertical relationship to any conventional pitch reference is unresolvable. This is not a failure of the system. It is the system. The city name's vertical position offers a pitch region rather than a pitch point, a zone of probability rather than a fixed frequency, and the performer's task is to inhabit that zone with the full understanding that its boundaries are determined by the typographic scale of the name rather than by the acoustic physics of a vibrating string.
The larger the name, the wider the zone. UUMMANNAQ fills a vertical range that spans multiple octaves of possibility. KANDY, rendered in a smaller size on an adjacent page, offers a narrower range, a more focused pitch field, a smaller aperture through which the performer's sound must pass. Scale is not decoration in toponymic notation. Scale is specification.
The Name as Duration
Conventional notation encodes duration through symbol type: a whole note lasts four beats, a half note two, a quarter note one, and the system subdivides from there with the arithmetic precision of a clock. The system presupposes that time is divisible into equal units and that the performer's task is to fit their sound into the correct unit.
City names do not fit into units. They occupy space. And in scores where the horizontal axis encodes time, the horizontal extension of a city name tells the performer how long to stay inside it.
UUMMANNAQ, nine letters in a condensed sans-serif typeface at a scale that occupies roughly a third of the score's full width, lasts longer than KANDY, four letters in a smaller typeface in the left margin. This is not a clock duration. It is a spatial duration, a duration measured in physical extension across the page rather than in seconds or beats, and its conversion into acoustic time is the performer's interpretive responsibility. Different performers will convert it differently. The score does not enforce a conversion rate. It enforces only the proportion: whatever UUMMANNAQ means in time, it means more of it than KANDY, and this proportional relationship is the compositional instruction.
What fills that time is another question. The city name does not specify pitch content, dynamic, articulation, or timbre. It specifies only that the performer is inside UUMMANNAQ for a certain amount of time, and that inside UUMMANNAQ is a different place from inside KANDY, and that the difference between those places is the difference between a city of nine hundred people on the coast of Greenland and a city of a hundred and forty thousand people in the hill country of Sri Lanka, and that this difference, cultural, climatic, linguistic, temporal, geographic, is available to the performer as compositional material if they choose to use it.
The Name as Cultural Memory
This is where toponymic notation departs most radically from every notational system that preceded it.
A conventional note head carries no cultural memory. B-natural is B-natural regardless of who plays it, where, or when. The note's meaning is exhausted by its acoustic specification. This is the source of conventional notation's power and its limitation: it can encode exactly what a sound is, and it cannot encode anything about what that sound means in the world.
City names carry nothing but cultural memory. SAMARKAND is not merely a sequence of nine letters occupying a horizontal span on a score page. It is the Silk Road. It is Tamerlane's mausoleum. It is the specific quality of light on the tilework of the Registan in the early morning. It is the idea of a city at the edge of the known world that has been rebuilt so many times by so many civilizations that its current form is an aggregate of destructions and reconstructions whose individual layers are no longer separable. It is a word that English-language poets have used for three centuries as a metonym for beautiful and distant and irretrievably other. All of this is available to a performer who knows what SAMARKAND means, and the score does not require that the performer know any of it, and the score produces a fundamentally different performance from a performer who knows all of it than from one who does not.
This is the productive instability of toponymic notation. The score encodes more information than any performer can fully decode, and the excess of information is not a problem to be solved but a condition to be inhabited. The city names are not puzzles. They are environments. The performer moves through them the way a traveler moves through a city: noticing some things, missing others, constructing a route that is personal and provisional and would have been different on a different day or with a different set of prior experiences.
The sequence of city names within a single score page is itself a compositional argument. ARCATA before LUCKNOW before SAMARKAND before CHONGQING before CEBU CITY before BATON ROUGE before UUMMANNAQ is not a random sequence. It is a journey whose logic is not geographic but associative, tonal, temperamental, rhythmic in its alternation of the familiar and the foreign, the small and the large, the pronounceable and the resistant. The performer who reads this sequence and feels nothing about the transition from BATON ROUGE to UUMMANNAQ has not yet understood what kind of score they are reading.
The Name as Performative Provocation
There is a harder argument embedded in toponymic notation that the preceding analysis has approached but not directly stated.
When a composer places MAE HONG SON or GYEONGJU or FISHGUARD in a score alongside microtonal accidentals drawn from Ben Johnston and the Sagittal system and fragments of a playing card and a dissected form from a natural history engraving, they are making a claim about what counts as musical material. They are saying that the specific acoustic history of a city in northern Thailand, or the specific ceramic heritage of a Korean city whose name most Western performers will encounter for the first time in this score, is as legitimate a source of compositional material as the just intonation tuning system developed by an American composer in Illinois, or the historical accidental symbols developed in European Renaissance music theory.
This claim is not stated. It does not need to be stated. It is enacted by the placement of the names on the page, by their scale, by their position relative to the stave, by the absence of any explanation or footnote that would hierarchize them as exotic or supplementary relative to the Western notational elements they coexist with. The city names are not illustrations of the music. They are the music. Their coexistence with microtonal accidentals and playing cards and dice is a compositional argument about what music is and where it comes from and whose cultural memory it carries.
A performer who has been to Mae Hong Son knows something that a performer who has not been there does not know, and the score offers that knowledge as a source of material without requiring its use. A performer who has never heard of Gyeongju can locate it in ten seconds on a phone and discover that it was the capital of the Silla kingdom for a thousand years and is now a city of two hundred and fifty thousand people surrounded by burial mounds, and this discovery, made in the act of preparing a performance, is already a performative act, already inside the piece, already changing what the performer brings to the stave and the accidentals and the dice.
The city name provokes research. The research produces knowledge. The knowledge enters the performance. The performance carries the city into the acoustic space of a concert hall or a gallery or a room where no one expected to hear Mae Hong Son mentioned, and for the duration of the performance, Mae Hong Son is there.
The Sequence as Argument
Return to the score pages and look at both sequences together.
Page one: ARCATA, LUCKNOW, SAMARKAND, CHONGQING, CEBU CITY, BATON ROUGE, UUMMANNAQ.
Page two: KANDY, STRUGA, FISHGUARD, PETOSKEY, GYEONGJU, CEDAR RAPIDS, MAE HONG SON.
These are not random cities. They are not the largest cities in the world, or the most famous, or the most frequently cited in Western cultural production. They are cities chosen for their acoustic properties as words, their cultural weight as places, their position in the sequence relative to what precedes and follows them, and the specific quality of the distance they represent: not geographical distance from the performer's location, but cultural and linguistic distance from the Western notational tradition within which the score is otherwise operating.
Petoskey, Michigan and Mae Hong Son, Thailand are not equivalent as cities. They are equivalent as notational elements within this score, and that equivalence is itself a compositional statement: that a small resort town on the northern shore of Lake Michigan and a provincial capital in the mountains of northwestern Thailand occupy the same position in the score's system of values, which is to say that the score's system of values does not reproduce the global hierarchy of cultural importance that places New York and London at the center and everywhere else at varying distances from it.
This is toponymic notation's deepest provocation. It does not argue for this position. It enacts it. Every performance of a score containing these city names in this sequence is, whether the performer intends it or not, a performance of a world in which Struga and UUMMANNAQ are as compositionally significant as any pitch in the equal-tempered chromatic scale.
The stave runs through the middle of that world. The accidentals float above it. The dice and the playing cards sit at its edges. And the city names hold the whole thing open, refusing to let the score close into a single meaning, insisting that the world outside the page is inside the music, insisting that where you have been and where you have never been are both available as material, insisting that the distance between CEDAR RAPIDS and MAE HONG SON is not a problem to be solved but a space to be sounded.
Sound Morphology is an ongoing investigation into the edges of compositional thinking.
