"Immoral Geography"
for Soprano Saxophone
Bil Smith Composer
Link to PDF
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sRWIVRMHbeTOVzXm7C25HJ4TlCmyHhcj/view?usp=sharing
The next word on new music.
"Immoral Geography"
for Soprano Saxophone
Bil Smith Composer
Link to PDF
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sRWIVRMHbeTOVzXm7C25HJ4TlCmyHhcj/view?usp=sharing
Notational Epidemiology frames individual gestures or passages within a score as biologically contained units, isolated from one another by visual "containment fields" (boxes, hatching, color-coding) that performers must decide whether to breach. Cross-contamination between supposedly quarantined material becomes a compositional event in itself, and the performer is recast as something between a lab technician and a quarantine violator.
At its core, Pelippopism asserts that a musical score, is not an antecedent to sound, but a non-hierarchical parallel to sound, language, and architectural form. The term itself, with its recursive loops of plosive and sibilant sounds, evokes the vibrational logic of both semiotic interference and kinetic movement. It presents sound as a glyphic vibration, notation as optical residue.
In my compositions, such as Effluvium and Retro-Gradient Lustration, or A Game of Curtains, Glass Door, Twice Closed, Pelippopism reveals itself through the layering of modular symbol-sets, syntactic disobedience, and a rejection of stasis. Scores become "anarchival zones" in which the functions of notation are subjected to erasure, overwriting, and distortion. They become gestures that enact Pelippopist refusal.
Pelippopist works often begin as corrupted vectors with post-architectural blueprints infected by linguistic spores and pharmacological diagrammatics. On the page, this takes the form of compositional glyphs that recall industrial design patents, histological charts, or circuit board overlays. The typographic elements, often modeled after extralinguistic scripts or proprietary fonts, function not as legible carriers of meaning but as disrupted conduits subject to failure, re-appropriation, and misreading.
In this framework, Pelippopism is less a doctrine than a behavior. The composer acts not as author, but as cartographer of chaotic fields. The score becomes an event horizon where disciplinary silos collapse: notation as textile, performance as forensic audit, typography as bio-linguistic residue.
Pelippopism demands that performers not interpret, but inhabit the score. Rather than seeking fidelity, the performer becomes a strategic interlocutor between unstable systems. In one example, the presence of transparent euphoniums, spectrographic glyph overlays, and asemic typographies requires the musician to interact with the score as though it were a spatialized hologram reading not in time, but across layers of opacity, feedback, and contradiction.
Such performative instability is not an error but a core feature of the Pelippopist ontology. The score is not a pre-image of performance, but a provocative partner, oscillating between architecture, image, and ruin.
Conceptually, Pelippopism aligns with para-Futurist sensibilities, Lettrist dérives, and the anti-systemic gestures of Jean Tinguely and Hanne Darboven. However, my embrace of pharmaceutical nomenclature, forensic simulation, and speculative linguistics places Pelippopism within a distinctly post-biotechnological aesthetic. It is a mode that treats the score as a semiotic organ, constantly rewriting itself through contamination, refusal, and breakdown.
In this light, Pelippopism is not merely a neologism. It is a methodological disorder that invites mutation, a radical anti-mnemonic strategy for encoding musical thought in the age of spectral excess and information decay.
Pelippopism offers a new topology for thinking the musical score, not as static artifact, but as a feedback vector, a non-linear libretto, and a semiotic surface infected by language, image, and speculative pharmacology. It serves as both aesthetic provocation and conceptual scaffolding. It is a refusal to resolve, a demand to reconceive.
"Fundamental Assumptions and Forgotten Lore”
For Piccolo Oboe
Bil Smith Composer
Link to Full Score PDF
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W4pbc91kOjsInli9jZEfkDSlGO1KXXFt/view?usp=sharing
The score's foundation in liminality; its inherent resistance to being confined within the precise, well-defined borders of traditional notation, serves as a critical point of departure for understanding its essence. To fully engage with this piece is to embrace a fluidity and ambiguity that traditional musical analysis often seeks to circumvent. This embracive attitude toward the liminal allows this work to exist in a state of continuous conversation across a myriad of categorical divides, thereby challenging the performer to consider the piece not only as a composition but as a dialogue with the broader world of art and ideas.
The visualizations are not mere adornments but are integral to the piece's structure, offering a cinematic collage that intertwines with the music to create a multisensory experience. The score's engagement with complex concepts such as diasporic Blackness and theorizations of the Global South provides a fulcrum for its wide-ranging explorations, positioning the piece not merely as a musical work but as a scholarly investigation into the intersections of culture, identity, and history.
This approach to composition and notation, where the score becomes a site of interdisciplinary inquiry, reflects a broader trend in contemporary art toward the dissolution of boundaries between artistic mediums. "Fundamental Assumptions and Forgotten Lore," in its refusal to adhere to the conventional limitations of its form, invites us to reconsider the potential of the musical score as a vessel for conveying complex, nuanced ideas. The piece's reliance on visual and conceptual elements to complement and complicate its musical content encourages a mode of engagement that is both intellectual and emotional, demanding of its audience not passive consumption but active participation in the work's multifaceted dialogue.
This is not music as known to ears that crave the comfort of resolution, nor is it art to eyes that seek the solace of clarity. It is, rather, an aesthetics of imperfection, a deliberate pursuit of the unfinished, where the value lies not in the answers provided but in the questions posed, in the improvisation that unravels composition, in the contingency that unravels certainty, in the openings that defy closure.
This composition, in its refusal to adhere to the dictates of form, in its celebration of the unfinished, poses a challenge to the very notion of understanding. It demands a relinquishment of the desire for completion, an acceptance of the perpetual state of incompletion, as the truest expression of the spirit.
on the notational ontology of Bil Smith Composer
“To puncture a monument is to reassign its meaning. To make it bleed, to make it breathe. To open it to air and error.”
Somewhere between the artifact and the assertion, between architecture and aphasia, lies the notational system Bil Smith refers to, provocatively and almost reluctantly, as Perforated Monumentalism. A term that resists both fixed interpretation and flippant dismissal. Like most of his titles, it functions less as a description and more as a provocation, or maybe a dare.
To witness one of Smith’s scores, particularly those found at the overlap of his graphic notations and compositional objects, is to encounter not music in the traditional sense, but the weather of music: its affective fronts, its pressure zones, its swirling disarrays of meaning, scale, and debris. What Perforated Monumentalism does is insist on the paradox that music can be both massive and absent, declared and hollowed out.
It’s a term I can’t stop turning over in my mouth: perforated...to puncture, to tear, to allow light through. And monumental, to endure, to stabilize, to cast shadows. But what happens when we perforate the monumental? When what should be a declaration is instead a ruin? When the authority of notation becomes not a command, but a wound?
The first time I held a score printed in this mode (let’s say one from the Symphora Domitorium series, whose paper seemed overburdened by the violence of its own symbols) I didn’t know how to read it. Or rather, I was aware that I couldn’t not read it, even if I couldn’t play it. The page was no longer a medium; it was a landscape. Each glyph, each splatter of ink, each architectural line eroded by hand-scratching or the ghost of a scanned archival diagram, seemed not to say something, but to refuse something.
Refusal, in Smith’s system, is not nihilism. It’s the gesture of carving space... for dissonance, for materiality, for the untranslatable. You could think of these scores as monuments that have been sabotaged from within, but not destroyed. Their perforation is not erasure, it’s permeability. It’s how meaning seeps in, sideways, out of sync.
I think of a performer, let’s call her L., standing before one of these works, a single page rendered in cynthene, ash, wax pencil, powdered graphite, and archival resin. L. tells me she “approaches it like standing in front of something that remembers being destroyed.” I love this. It reminds me that scores, like people, carry trauma in their structure. They don’t speak it... they are it.
Perforated Monumentalism, then, is less a technique than a comportment. It invites the performer into the score not as executor, but as excavator. It asks: How do you render a thing that was designed to not quite cohere? How do you translate the hollowness of a monument without reasserting its power?
Smith’s notations, many of which feature gaping voids, surgical cuts, and images of brutalist fragments, seem to beg this question. Some scores feature facial profiles of his selected “models,” distorted through analog glitching or topographic segmentation. Others include medical diagrams, architectural site plans, or what look like exploded pharmaceutical blister packs. This is not window dressing. This is the debris field in which performance occurs.
In this, Perforated Monumentalism joins a lineage of other hybrid notational ontologies. Think Cardew’s graphic disobedience, Xenakis’s architectonic geometries, even Jorinde Voigt’s gestural topographies, but what sets it apart is its commitment to rupture as fidelity. To mark meaning by interrupting it.
To say that this work is beautiful feels, frankly, like a failure of language. It’s more accurate to say it is charged. The way a quiet room feels after someone has screamed. The way a statue looks when it’s been painted pink.
And this, I suspect, is the point. The monument remains, but now it leaks.
- Andrew Vecset
In 2015, on SoundMorphology, I introduced The Numerics: a compositional archetype that does not merely reimagine notation, but displaces it entirely, reconstituting the score as a computational medium. Rendered through numerical data engineered for modified cello performance, The Numerics proceeds from a single, uncompromising premise: sequences of durations, pitch indices, and micro-dynamics are not supplemental annotations appended to conventional notation. They are the composition itself. Each number functions simultaneously as instruction and structural node, a dual ontology that gives rise to what I call a contextualized numerical architecture, wherein the score and its execution are, in principle, inseparable.
Numeric Scores as Performative Systems
The Numerics poses a question that is, at once, philosophical and technical: what is fundamentally altered when glyphs surrender to values? The cellist receives a tablature built from integers and decimal points, each mapped to pitch, duration, bow pressure, or harmonic index. Reading becomes real-time translation, pattern resolving into gesture, computation dissolving into corporeal music. The performer does not interpret a symbol. They execute a value, and in that execution, become a processing engine of a higher order.
Contextualization and Referential Coding
No datum in The Numerics exists in isolation. A "6" may designate G♯ on the third string under heavy bow pressure; a "0.5" may encode staccato or microglissando. Meaning is never intrinsic; it is always relational, always contingent upon a performative grammar established at rehearsal and internalized through practice. This is not vagueness. It is precision of a different kind: a living code-language in which the performer's intelligence is not a supplement to the score, but its necessary condition of existence.
Generative and Adaptive Performance
Because The Numerics is computational in its essence, it is also generative in its potential. Performers may apply Fibonacci proportions to bow velocity, invert duration sequences, transpose rhythmic arrays, or derive new value sets through algorithmic manipulation of existing ones. The score does not prescribe a singular reading; it establishes a numerical platform from which an indefinite series of structurally coherent performances may be generated. Each iteration is both faithful to the architecture and irreducibly its own event.
Toward a New Notational Paradigm
The Numerics does not extend the history of Western notation. It breaks from it. The score is no longer a static artifact to be transcribed into sound; it is data to be parsed, processed, and performed. It inaugurates a hybrid condition in which scores are computational objects, performers are algorithmic agents, and notation functions as a live interface rather than a historical document. The decimal point, once a mere delimiter of subdivision, becomes something else entirely: not a proscription, but a threshold, a portal into a practice where composition, computation, and performance are no longer distinct acts, but a single, continuous, irreversible operation.